VIE 27 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2024 - 01:01hs.
First club to speak out in favor

Fluminense asks the Supreme Court to participate in ‘Bets’ hearing, defends bookmakers actions

Fluminense asked the Supreme Court (STF) to join as amicus curiae in the lawsuit in which the National Confederation of Commerce of Goods, Services and Tourism asks the Supreme Court to declare the betting law unconstitutional. The club took the opportunity to ask that it be maintained, claiming that any revocation would be a blow to its finances and those of others. This is the first statement by a football club in the lawsuit.

As the journalist Lauro Jardim reported in his column in O Globo, Fluminense claims that a considerable part of the resources allocated by the 'Bets' - as operators are called in Brazil - to advertising campaigns are returned, “in the form of sports sponsorships,” to the teams. The document states:

"The impact of such funds on the development of professional football in the country is undeniable. Currently, 75% of the clubs in the Brazilian Championship Series A have companies that operate sports betting as their main sponsors."

"It is estimated that, in 2024, the amounts resulting from contracts with betting companies will represent almost 15% of the total revenues of the clubs in the two main divisions of the national competition."

Fluminense signed a contract worth more than R$150 million (US$ 26m) with Superbet for three seasons, becoming one of the five highest agreements in Brazilian football.

Next Monday (11), the Supreme Federal Court will hold a public hearing with several interested parties to discuss the impacts of online betting on public health and the economy.

Fluminense's request to be amicus curiae in the STF action, if accepted, authorizes it to present memorials and make oral arguments in trials.

Source: O Globo