It will be the responsibility of
Since the federal government announced the award of the Lotex instant lottery, Able (Brazilian Association of State Lotteries) and
According to him, the monopoly of lotteries does not belong to the
The privatization process of
Still remains, after the action presented by Able and Loterj, to wait for a position to be taken by Febralot, the federation of lottery companies, which is ultimately an important part of the Brazilian lottery market as it represents about 13,000 points of sales in the country. That is much lower than what is expected from channels for the future
Asked about these actions, ABLE's attorneys Roberto Carvalho Brasil Fernandes, João Carlos Dalmagro and Alexandre Amaral explained to the GMB the following:
The Brazilian Association of State Lotteries – ABLE- filed an action entitled ADPF - Arbitration of Non-Compliance with Fundamental Precept, so that the Federal Supreme Court recognizes that there is no monopoly of the Government for the exploitation of Lottery products.
The Federal Constitution prohibits monopoly in Brazil, except for the economic activities provided for in article 177 and the exclusive services provided for in article 21, XI and XII of CF / 88, and in this relationship, there is no Lottery, Drawings (article 22, XX) or Numeric Prognostic Contests (article 195, III).
The rule in Brazil is free competition and free initiative, provided for in article 170, IV and sole paragraph of the Constitution.
The same solution was adopted by the Government of Rio de Janeiro and by the Government of Piauí, whose issue has gained relevance, so that ADPF 455, 492 and ADPF 493 are currently in the STF, all of which argue that there is an offense to the federative form of Brazil, principle of autonomy and competence of states, in addition to the principle of efficiency and the constitutional fence of monopoly.
The reason for the actions is the action of the Ministry of Finance, which they see as questioning the operation of the State Lotteries, by virtue of a law of 1967, the notorious Decree Law 204. As a result, the arguers - ABLE, Rio de Janeiro and Piauí, that Articles 1 and 32 of Decree-Law 204/67 should be declared "not approved" by the Constitution, so that it no longer serves as a legal basis for the attempt to establish a monopoly on the lottery activity in the country, shivers of the fundamental precepts invoked.
Actions 492 and 493 are pending analysis of Minister Gilmar Mendes and ADPF 455, already received, is processed in the report of Minister Luiz Fux.
Source: GMB